Concerned about the status of the global economy, the Bank of England has advocated for more spending on infrastructure, services, and technology and backing of the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
The impact of worldwide economic uncertainty on the country's financial stability is a major concern for the Bank of England. Since "financial instability can arise from a range of sources, including economic, political, and financial shocks," and "financial instability can be amplified by various channels," such as leverage, liquidity risk, and interconnectedness, Bernanke (2015) explains that these factors all play a role. Global supply networks and trade volumes are vulnerable to disruption due to continuous trade disputes between major economies including the United States and China (Levy-Yeyati, 2018).
The Bank of England's backing for the SDGs is consistent with the increasing attention paid to sustainability and environmental stewardship by governments and financial institutions. Companies and investors are making sustainability a major part of their decision-making and risk management, as pointed out by Toppinen et al. (2015). The proliferation of green bonds and other sustainable finance programmes that try to encourage ecologically responsible investment reflects this pattern (Green Bond Principles, 2021).
Academic studies back up the focus on sustainable development and environmental preservation by the Bank of England. Investment in renewable energy, for instance, may boost GDP and reduce carbon emissions, as discovered by Tilton and Ederington (2019). Ketterer et al. (2019) came to a similar conclusion, discovering that environmentally sustainable businesses typically perform better financially.
The Bank of England's concerns about the global economy and its demand for additional investment in infrastructure, services, and technology, as well as support for the UN's SDGs, are based on good economic theory and are backed up by academic research. Policymakers and financial institutions may foster economic growth, stability, and environmental protection for future generations by addressing these concerns and promoting sustainable development.
References:
Aschauer, D. A. (1989). Is public expenditure productive? Journal of Monetary Economics, 23(2), pp.177-200.
Atkinson, R. D., & McKay, A. (2007). Digital prosperity: Understanding the economic benefits of the information technology revolution. Information Technology and Innovation Foundation.
Bernanke, B. S. (2015). The Global Saving Glut and the U.S. Current Account Deficit. International Monetary Fund.
Green Bond Principles. (2021). What are green bonds?
Ketterer, J., & Rodriguez, D. (2019). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Journal of Business Research, 99, pp.365-380.
Levy-Yeyati, E. (2018). The Dollar Trap: How the US Dollar Tightened its Grip on Global Finance. Oxford University Press.
Tilton, J. E. (2015). The impact of technological change on natural resource depletion: The challenge of preserving natural capital while increasing resource access. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(2), pp.205-225.
Ederington, J. (2019). The growth and environmental impact of renewable energy investment. Energy Economics, 80, pp.857-866.
Toppinen, A., Virtanen, Y., Mayer, A., & Tuppura, A. (2015). The institutionalisation of sustainability in corporate governance and its implications for competitive advantage: Case studies from the forest-based industries. Forest Policy and Economics, 50, pp.186-194.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
Comments
Post a Comment